UPDATED: 09-08-25 10:43 PDT

men Lewis 2
  
Lewis                 
W-L: (12- 5) PR = 95.0824

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 207 A Newberry SAC (10- 7, 94.5) 12-10 209 A Limestone SAC (15- 2, 99.5) 8-19 215 A Walsh GMAC (10- 8, 89.9) 14- 7 222 H Lake Erie GMAC ( 7- 7, 88.2) 16- 7 225 A Tiffin GMAC ( 3- 9, 84.3) 23- 2 308 H Westminster (UT) RMAC ( 7- 7, 93.4) 13-12 311 H Northwood GMAC ( 5- 9, 86.6) 20- 7 315 H Davenport GLVC ( 6- 9, 88.4) 20- 6 318 H Quincy GLVC ( 4- 7, 89.1) 18- 4 322 H Alabama-Huntsville PBC ( 2-14, 91.0) 20- 5 329 H Seton Hill GMAC (17- 1, 98.6) 9-17 405 A Maryville GLVC (12- 4, 96.6) 10-14 412 H Indianapolis GLVC ( 7- 8, 94.3) 9- 5 419 H William Jewell GLVC ( 2-12, 87.7) 23- 7 426 A Rockhurst GLVC ( 8- 6, 94.1) 7- 8 501 N Rockhurst GLVC ( 8- 6, 94.1) 11-10 503 A Maryville GLVC (12- 4, 96.6) 8- 9

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   207 A Newberry               12-10       2     0    +      2.02
   209 A Limestone               8-19     -11    -5           0.00
   215 A Walsh                  14- 7       7     5           0.42
   222 H Lake Erie              16- 7       9     8           0.00
   225 A Tiffin                 23- 2      21    10           0.00
   308 H Westminster (UT)       13-12       1     2          -1.32
   311 H Northwood              20- 7      13     9           0.00
   315 H Davenport              20- 6      14     7           0.00
   318 H Quincy                 18- 4      14     7           0.00
   322 H Alabama-Huntsville     20- 5      15     5           0.26
   329 H Seton Hill              9-17      -8    -3    -     -2.14
   405 A Maryville              10-14      -4    -2          -1.81
   412 H Indianapolis            9- 5       4     1    +      2.62
   419 H William Jewell         23- 7      16     8           0.00
   426 A Rockhurst               7- 8      -1     0          -1.29
   501 N Rockhurst              11-10       1     1           0.06
   503 A Maryville               8- 9      -1    -2           1.19

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   329 H Seton Hill              9-17      -8    -3    -     -2.14

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   207 A Newberry               12-10       2     0    +      2.02
   412 H Indianapolis            9- 5       4     1    +      2.62

Lewis Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Adams State Lewis insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Lewis
Adelphi Adelphi   Adelphi
Alabama-Huntsville Lewis Lewis  
American International Lewis   Lewis
Anderson (SC) Anderson (SC) tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Anderson (SC)
Assumption Lewis   Lewis
Barton Lewis   Lewis
Belmont Abbey Lewis   Lewis
Bentley Lewis   Lewis
Bridgeport Lewis   Lewis
Caldwell Lewis   Lewis
Catawba Lewis insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Lewis
Chestnut Hill Lewis tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Lewis
Chowan Lewis insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Lewis
Coker Lewis insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Lewis
Colorado Mesa Colorado Mesa tied - ( 3- 1) ( 3- 0) Colorado Mesa
Concordia-Irvine Lewis tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Lewis
D'Youville Lewis tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Lewis
Davenport Lewis Lewis  
Davis & Elkins Lewis Lewis   5- 1 vs 0- 6
District of Columbia Lewis   Lewis
Dominican (CA) Lewis insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Lewis
Dominican (NY) Lewis   Lewis
Embry-Riddle Lewis tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Lewis
Emmanuel (GA) Lewis   Lewis
Emory & Henry Lewis insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Lewis
Felician Lewis insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Lewis
Flagler Flagler tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Flagler
Florida Southern Lewis tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Lewis
Florida Tech Lewis tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Lewis
Franklin Pierce Lewis   Lewis
Frostburg State Lewis insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Lewis
Georgian Court Lewis   Lewis
Holy Family Lewis tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Lewis
Indianapolis Lewis Lewis  
Lake Erie Lewis Lewis  
Lander Lewis insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 2- 2) Lewis
Lees-McRae Lewis tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Lewis
Lenoir-Rhyne Lenoir-Rhyne insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) Lenoir-Rhyne
Limestone Limestone Limestone  
Lincoln Memorial Lewis insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) Lewis
Lynn Lewis insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Lewis
Malone Lewis Lewis   6- 1 vs 1- 6
Mars Hill Lewis insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Lewis
Maryville Maryville Maryville  
Mercy Lewis   Lewis
Molloy Lewis   Lewis
Montevallo Lewis tied - ( 4- 1) ( 4- 1) Lewis
Mount Olive Lewis insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Lewis
Newberry Lewis Lewis  
North Greenville Lewis   Lewis
Northwood Lewis Lewis  
Pace Pace tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Pace
Palm Beach Atlantic Lewis   Lewis
Post Lewis   Lewis
Quincy Lewis Lewis  
Roberts Wesleyan Lewis insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Lewis
Rockhurst Lewis tied - ( 5- 1) ( 5- 1) Lewis
Rollins Rollins tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Rollins
Seton Hill Seton Hill Seton Hill  
Shorter Lewis   Lewis
Southern New Hampshire Lewis   Lewis
St Anselm St Anselm   St Anselm
St Leo Lewis insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 0) Lewis
St Michaels Lewis   Lewis
St Thomas Aquinas Lewis   Lewis
Tampa Tampa Tampa   5- 0 vs 2- 4
Thomas More Lewis Lewis   5- 1 vs 1- 5
Tiffin Lewis Lewis  
Tusculum Lewis insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Lewis
Virginia State Lewis   Lewis
Walsh Lewis Lewis  
Westminster (UT) Lewis Lewis  
Wheeling Lewis Lewis   5- 1 vs 3- 3
William Jewell Lewis Lewis  
Wilmington (DE) Lewis tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Lewis
Wingate Wingate insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Wingate
Young Harris Lewis insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Lewis

PowerWise = 65


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 14.61

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Newberry        (10- 7, 94.5)    12-10       -5.44      19.66       0.64         0.86            17.44
   0 A Limestone       (15- 2, 99.5)     8-19       -0.43      24.67       0.64         0.86            -0.18
   0 A Walsh           (10- 8, 89.9)    14- 7      -10.04      15.05       0.64         0.86            13.49
   0 H Lake Erie       ( 7- 7, 88.2)    16- 7      -11.72      13.37      -0.64         0.86            10.94
   0 A Tiffin          ( 3- 9, 84.3)    23- 2      -15.63       9.46       0.64         0.86             8.68
   0 H Westminster (U  ( 7- 7, 93.4)    13-12       -6.50      18.60      -0.64         0.86            15.43
   0 H Northwood       ( 5- 9, 86.6)    20- 7      -13.27      11.82      -0.64         0.86             9.60
   0 H Davenport       ( 6- 9, 88.4)    20- 6      -11.52      13.58      -0.64         0.86            11.11
   0 H Quincy          ( 4- 7, 89.1)    18- 4      -10.76      14.33      -0.64         0.86            11.76
   0 H Alabama-Huntsv  ( 2-14, 91.0)    20- 5       -8.91      16.18      -0.64         0.86            13.35
   0 H Seton Hill      (17- 1, 98.6)     9-17       -1.31      23.78      -0.64         0.86            -1.68
   0 A Maryville       (12- 4, 96.6)    10-14       -3.27      21.83       0.64         0.86            -2.26
   0 H Indianapolis    ( 7- 8, 94.3)     9- 5       -5.55      19.54      -0.64         0.86            16.24
   0 H William Jewell  ( 2-12, 87.7)    23- 7      -12.19      12.91      -0.64         0.86            10.54
   0 A Rockhurst       ( 8- 6, 94.1)     7- 8       -5.76      19.34       0.64         0.86            -4.39
   0 N Rockhurst       ( 8- 6, 94.1)    11-10       -5.76      19.34      -0.00         0.86            16.62
   0 A Maryville       (12- 4, 96.6)     8- 9       -3.27      21.83       0.64         0.86            -2.26
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       144.44

winning pts = 155.2086 losing points = -10.7710

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------